top of page

‘Girl Power’ Repackaged: Is the Increasing Presence of ‘Girl’ Trends Online Regressing the Progression of Feminism?

Writer's picture: Amy Wood (she/her)Amy Wood (she/her)

During another doomscroll on social media, I’ve noticed an increasingly patterned

trend: the categorisation of women into sub-aesthetics. Digital culture feeds into a

wider cultural obsession with the commodification of femininity through the recycling of

‘girl’ trends online. This begs the question: is this a harmful engagement with identity or

a subtle regression of feminism?


From ‘clean girl’ to ‘brat summer’, digital spaces reshape and regurgitate micro-trends

for viewers to mindlessly consume. Such trends are characterised by particular

aesthetics, often contingent on appearances grounded in hyper-femininity.

Each sub-aesthetic is entangled with overconsumption, ranging from skincare to

lifestyles. This endless pursuit of outer transformation seems futile as a new trend

materialises to replace the old, making it impossible to keep up.


On the surface, trends like ‘hot girls can’t __’ seem to be playful engagement with irony

yet is dependent on self-internalised misogyny. This trend is contingent on appearance,

whereby worth is measured against an incapacity to do something. This doesn’t seem

exactly progressive, so it calls into question: is active participation in rebranding

ourselves considered anti-feminist?


This is unfortunately not a new trend. Every generation witnesses the arrival of feminine

ideals, repackaged in a new digital language. We can see how femininity is a

performance, with boundaries and expectations. With contemporary digital culture,

subcategories are seemingly created, promoted and consumed by women themselves.


I have to admit, I too have fallen victim to the phrase ‘I’m just a girl’. It has become

engrained into our language: an ironic colloquialism used a punchline - yet it is not

without implications. It subtly reinforces the idea of a certain fragility, which echoes the

way in which the digital sphere produces micro-trends which define, limit and prescribe

womanhood. This potentially reduces the complexity of womanhood to a singular

‘girlhood’, contingent on overconsumption to conform.


As we scroll endlessly, it is important to remain critical whilst consuming the new

identities circulating social media. The illusion of ‘girlhood’ within these trends

disguises their restrictive nature. Trends are quickly consumed and discarded,

positioning women to be in a state of self-reinvention, like the ‘girl boss’. So, as digital

spaces repackage existing societal constraints in palatable ways, it is essential to

recognise the limitations of self-categorisation.


Words by Amy Wood, she/her

Recent Posts

See All

Valentine’s Blues and Reds

I’ve never been in love. Valentine’s Day means nothing to me. It’s cute to watch my friends make gifts and plans with their significant...

On Girlhood

I am sitting on a balcony overlooking Paris, three days before my twenty-first birthday. It is easy to romanticise, the dried roses...

bottom of page